Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39651 (AP)

Smt Lanka Sharada Suvarchaladevi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/45854/2018 · 2025-08-18

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010948722018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45854/2018 Between: 1. SMT LANKA SHARADA SUVARCHALADEVI, W/O SRIPADA SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCU HOUSEWIFE, R/O RELANGI VILLAGE, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IRAGAVARAM POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 4. K VENKANNA BABU, S/O CHANDRA RAO, OCC. BUSINESS. R/O D NO. 9-41/1, NEAR SANGAMPAKA, RELANGI VILLAGE, LRAGAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 5. DUGGIRALA UMAMAHESWAR RAO, S/O RAMARAO, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D NO. 12-30, VATLURU VILLAGE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Wirt, Direction or questioning the action of the respondents 1 to 3 not registering the FIR by considering the representations dated 02.10.2018 and 06.12.2018 as illegal arbitrary and volatile of Article 21, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents police to register crime against the respondents 4 and 5 here in and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to register the FIR against the respondents 4 & 5 here in and their followers and take necessary action against the respondents 4 & 5 by registering the FIR for alleged offences according to law pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45854 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed alleging that the police did not registered FIR basing on the petitioner’s report. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that basing on the petitioners report, the Police registered as case in Crime No.174 of 2018 and after due investigation, laid charge sheet vide C.C.No.453 of 2024 before the jurisdictional Magistrate on 27.06.2019 itself. 4. In view of the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition for further adjudication. 5. Recording the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 19.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45854 of 2018 Date: 19.08.2025 PSA