Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39650 (JHR)

SHAMBHU PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/434/2025 · 2025-11-06

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33173 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 434 of 2025 ----- Shambhu Prasad, S/o Late Harihar Prasad, R/o 302, Golden House, Partliputra Residency, Anandpuri, P.O.- GPO, P.S.-S.K. Puri, District-Patna .......... Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dr. Kumar Tarachand, Director, Department of Agriculture (now Food, Public Distribution and Consumer Affairs Department), Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi .......... Opp. Parties ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhanu Kumar No. 1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ankit Kumar, A.C. to S.C.-I ----- Order No.12 Date: 06.11.2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite party no. 2 for his wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 11.12.2023 passed in W.P. (S) No. 5551 of 2023. 2. On perusal of the show cause affidavit dated 26.09.2025 filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, it appears that the aforesaid order of this court has been complied and the arrear amount (on revision) i.e. Rs. 1,12,713/- has been paid to the petitioner, receipt of which has also been given by him. 3. Considering the said fact, there is no need to further proceed in the matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no. 2 is hereby dropped. 4. The present contempt case stands disposed of. 2025:JHHC:33173 2 5. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as available under law for redressal of his subsisting grievance. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 6th November, 2025 Vikas/