Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3965 (KER)

SATHYABHAMA SUKUMARAN v. VILLAGE OFFICER

WP(C)/8153/2025 · 2025-03-21

T R Ravi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:24543 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAVI FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2025/30TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO.8153 OF 2025 PETITIONER SATHYABHAMA SUKUMARAN AGED 50 YEARS W/O SUKUMARAN, KODAVANPADATH HOUSE, KUMBALAKKODE P.O, PAZHAYANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 680587 BY ADVS. V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR P.R.REENA RESPONDENTS 1 VILLAGE OFFICER PAZHAYANNUAR VILLAGE, PAZHAYANNUR, VADAKKETHARA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680587 2 SUB REGISTRAR PAZHAYANNUR SUB REGISTRY PAZHAYANNUR, VADAKKETHARA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680587 SMT. DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). No.8153 of 2025 2025:KER:24543 2 T.R. RAVI, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No.8153 of 2025 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of March, 2025 JUDGMENT The petitioner proposes to buy a property. The prayer in the writ petition is to direct the 1st respondent to issue record of rights (RoR) regarding the property covered by Ext.P5. The Village Officer has by Ext.P7, informed the proposed transferors about the pendency of revenue recovery proceedings against one among them, Sri Manikandan. The petitioner seeks to register the sale deed which will necessarily be subject to any claim in the revenue recovery proceedings. It is settled law that pendency of revenue recovery proceedings is not a bar for transferring a property. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to issue record of rights regarding the property covered by Ext.P5 to the petitioner, at the earliest, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- T.R. RAVI JUDGE Cak W.P.(C). No.8153 of 2025 2025:KER:24543 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8153/2025 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP(C).NO.39371/2023 DATED 26.07.2024 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION REPORTED IN 2018 (1) KHC 526 (MUHAMMED FAROOK V. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR AND OTHERS) EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT REPORTED IN 2012 KHC 2981 (RIMMY V. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS) EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.31292/2024 DATED 16.10.2024 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF REGISTERED AGREEMENT FOR SALE NO.853/1/2022 DATED 25.04.2022 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 05.02.2025 ISSUED BY THE SUB COLLECTOR THRISSUR EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25.02.2025 OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER TO MANIKANDAN