Manyam Amarnath Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/45420/2018 · 2025-07-22
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39649 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39649 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010940202018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 45420/2018 Between:
1. MANYAM AMARNATH REDDY, S/O SRINIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE AND HONORARY MANAGER- CUM-SECRETARY, SRI VYAS ASHRAMAM, NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJULAMANDYAM, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. D NAGARJUAN REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, THEN SUB-1 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GAJULAMANDYAM, PRESENTLY C/O. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE PRINCIPALCUMCHIEF SUPERINTENDENT OF EXAMINATIONS, GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE, PAPANAIDUPETA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2
6. THE REGIONAL INSPECTION OFFICER, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, NEAR ANNAMAYYA CIRCLE, R.C. ROAD (OPP. BAIRAGIPATTEDA ARCH), TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the acts of the 3rd and 4th respondents in arresting and detaining petitioner and filing Charge Sheet though no offence is attracted, as illegal and violative of Art. 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and besides violative of Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and specific directions of the Honorable Supreme Court and this Honorable Court by quashing the Charge Sheet and cognizance taken in C.C.No. 212/2018 on the file of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District and initiate appropriate action against the concerned and award compensation as may be fixed by this Honourable Court to me, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. 212/2015 on the file of V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the counter affidavit copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME (AP)
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 45420/2018 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the acts of the 3rd and 4th respondents in arresting and detaining petitioner and filing Charge Sheet though no offence is attracted, as illegal and violative of Art. 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and besides violative of Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and specific directions of the Honorable Supreme Court and this Honorable Court by quashing the Charge Sheet and cognizance taken in C.C.No. 212/2018 on the file of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District and initiate appropriate action against the concerned and award compensation…”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Sri Md. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.45420 of 2018
Dated.23.07.2025
UPS
153