Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39648 (AP)

Cheli Satish Babu v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/46318/2018 · 2025-08-12

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010958822018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46318/2018 Between: 1. CHELI SATISH BABU, S/O. SUBHAKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/O. VANAKURU VILLAGE PENAMULUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETAIRAT AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522020 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BUCKINGHAMPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH -520002 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, PINGALI VENKAIAH MARG, NEAR PWD GROUND, SURYARAOPETA, BUCKINGHAMPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH -520002 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMULURU POLICE STATION KANURU MAIN RD, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH -520007 5. CH ADINARAYANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS BATTUVARIPALLE KAREMPUDI TOWN AND 2 MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522 614 6. N KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS JULAKALLU VILLAGE PIDUGURALLA MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522413 7. KATTA GOPI, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS GANTASALA VILLAGE NEAR CHALLAPALLE MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521133 8. K NAGA NANCHARAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS PIPULA ROAD VIJAYAWADA TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520015 9. VALLURI LAKSHMANA, S/O. BANKA SIVA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS YAKAMURU VILLAGE VUYYURU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521165 10. M VENKAT KIRAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS NAVULURU VILLAGE MANGALAGIRI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522502 11. R V K VARMA, S/O. KRISHNAM RAJU AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS PIPULA ROAD VIJAYAWADA TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520015 12. Y GOPI KRISHNA, S/O. Y.NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS AVANIGADDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521121 13. T SHEKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS ITHAVARAM VILLAGE NANDIGAMA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521183. 14. K VICTOR, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS NAVULURU VILLAGE MANGALAGIRI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522502 15. INDIA PRABHAKAR, S/O. KRISTOPHER AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS JONNALAGADDA VILLAGE NARSARAOPETA MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522 601 3 16. R BABJI AAKASH, S/O. PRABHUDAS AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS PUNADHIPADU VILLAGE KANKIPADU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521151. 17. MANASA JAYAKANNA, W/O. DILPKUMAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS IBRAHIMPATNAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521456. 18. JOEL SUNNY, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS GUNTUR OLD RTO OFFICE PATTABHIPURAM TOWN AND MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522006 19. NAMBURI VISWA CHAITANYA, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS VUNTURU VILLAGE PENAMULURU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521151. 20. T ROCKSHEKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS VUDYADHARAPURAM VIJAYAWADA TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520012. 21. K HIMASRIKANTH, S/O. NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS MACHILIPATNAM TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 521001 22. M JESUDAS, S/O. KOVNALIES AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS VIJAYAWADA TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520001 23. P RAHUL, S/O. SURESH BABU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS VIJAYAWADA TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520001 24. P JAGADISH PRIYADARSHAN, S/O. NAGA MALLESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS VIJAYAWADA TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520001 25. T KHADAR BABU, S/O. SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS VIJAYAWADA TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 520001 ...RESPONDENT(S): 4 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in harassing the petitioner by interfering in civil dispute as illegal arbitrary and violation of article 21 of the constitution of India consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner by interfering in civil dispute and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent - Police Station not to call the petitioner to Penamuluru Police Station in civil dispute pending disposal of the W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G ALLABAKASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46318 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the preliminary enquiry of the Police would reveal that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is of civil in nature and therefore, they will not interfere in such civil dispute. 3. Recoding the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for necessary relief in the light of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M.Subramaniam Vs. S.Janaki and another1. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA 1 2020 (16) SCC 728 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46318 of 2018 Date: 13.08.2025 PSA