Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39645 (KAR)

MRS SARASAVANI v. MR.M.SUNANDA

WP/2073/2021 · 2025-09-02

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.2073/2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN 1 . MRS.SARASAVANI AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O LATE THIMMAREDDY Y M., 2 . MR T MADHU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O LATE THIMMAREDDY Y M BOTH THE APPLICANTS ARE RESIDING AT NO.91 REDDY COLONY YAMALUR VILLAGE AND POST BENGALURU -37 BOTH THE PETITIONERS 1 & 2 ARE THE L.R.’S OF THE DEFENDANT NO.1 IN TRAIL COURT …PETITIONER/S (BY SRI./SMT.: RAJAGOPALA NAIDU ADVOCATE) AND 1 . MRS.M.SUNANDA W/O Y P JAYARAMAREDDY AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3376 13TH ‘A’ MAIN ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU-38 MR.Y.M.THIMMAREDDY S/O LATE.M.MUNIREDDY RESIDING AT NO.91, REDDY COLONY W.P.NO.2073/2021 2 YAMALURU VILLAGE AND POST BENGALURU-37 SINCE DECEASED HIS L.R.’S ARE ALREADY THERE ON RECORD AS PETITIONERS 1 & 2. 2. MR.K.VENKATESHWAR RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O K.GOPALAKRISHNARAO RESIDING AT NO.4, CIRCULAR STREET SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-27, REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER MR.B.M.KARUNESH, S/O LATE MADAIAH NO.46, ADARSHPALM MEADOWS VARTHUR MAIN ROAD RAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE BENGALURU-66. …RESPONDENT/S THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE COMMON ORDERS DT 13.09.2019 PASSED IN FDP NO.14/2010 ON DISMISSING IA UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) R/W SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND APPLICATION U/S 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PASSED BY THE XXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, CCH NO.7 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO W.P.NO.2073/2021 3 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO) Petitioners’ counsel appears and sought time to comply the office objections. One week time is granted to comply the office objections, failing which, the writ petition stands dismissed without reference to Bench. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : JK COMPARED BY : JK COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR