APHC010974952018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 47635/2018 Between: 1. KELLA VENKATARAMANA, S/O SANYASINAIDU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. OCC, FIELD ASSISTANT, ALUGOLU GRAM PANCHAYAT. NELLIMERLA MANDAL. VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/THE PROGRAMME OFFICER, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, NELLIMERLA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND ADDITIONAL PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME,VIZIANAGARAM. VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus. declaring the action of the Respondent No.3, District Collector issuing Removal Orders to the Petitioner/Field Assistant vide his Proceedings in RC Nos.1857/2015/EGS dated 13.06.2016 without putting on notice against the principles of natural justice as illegal, arbitrary and it is further consequentially prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to set aside the same and to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3, to reinstate e Petitioner as Field Assistant and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus. declaring the action of the Respondent No.3, District Collector issuing Removal Orders to the Petitioner/Field Assistant vide his Proceedings in RC Nos.1857/2015/EGS dated 13.06.2016 without putting on notice against the principles of natural justice as illegal, arbitrary and it is further consequentially prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to set aside the same and to direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3, to reinstate e Petitioner as Field Assistant and pass ....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Services and learned Special Standing Counsel appearing for MGNREGS are in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 47635 of 2018 02.07.2025 Mjl /*