1 2025:CGHC:38180 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 735 of 2021 1 - Smt. Munni Bakhla W/o Late William Bkhla Aged About 45 Years Cate Uraon R/o Village Raigarh Road, Patthalgaon, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur Chahttisgarh. 2 - Ku. Sakshi Bakhla D/o Late William Bakhla, Aged About 14 Years Minor Represented Through Legal Guardian And Mother Smt. Munni Bakhla, Cate Uraon R/o Village Raigarh Road, Patthalgaon, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur Chahttisgarh. 3 - Ku. Megha Bakhla D/o Late William Bakhla, Aged About 10 Years Minor Represented Through Legal Guardian And Mother Smt. Munni Bakhla, Cate Uraon R/o Village Raigarh Road, Patthalgaon, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur Chahttisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Sanjay Kumar Yadav S/o Sibo Ram Yadav Aged About 27 Years R/o Mahkultoli (Farsabahar), Tahsiul Farsabahar, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh (Driver) 2 - Gopichand Patel S/o Raju Ram Patel R/o Village Nehru Nagar, Near Pump House, Balco Nagar, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh (Vehicle Owner) 3 - United India Insurance Company Limited Address-Lic Building, First Floor, Magar Para Road, Beside Kalyani Hospital, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Police No. 2707003120p107253961 Valid From 03-10-2021 To 02-10-2021 Midnigh (Insurer) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate 2 For Respondent No.1 For Respondent No.3 : : Mr. Aishwarya Kumar Dubey, Advocate Mr. H. B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Along with Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 01/08/2025 1. In the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.10.2021 passed by the learned Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patthalgaon, District jashpur, passed in Claim Case No. 21/2021. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Claim Case No. 21/2021 has already been dismissed by the learned Tribunal vide order dated 15.12.2021. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that Claim Case No. 21/2021 has already been dismissed, this petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim