Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040004352025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/121/2025 Smti Yorme Hiba Daughter of Late Tayor Hiba, permanent resident of Tado Gitu Village, PO and PS Tato, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Secretary, Land Management, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Land Acquisition Collector/ Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Tato Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd Age: 0 Occupation : represented by Executive Director (PA and BD) NEEPCO Bhawan RG Baruah Road Guwahati 781005 4:Tapik Hiba Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Tami Hiba permanent resident of Tado Gitu Village Po and PS Tato Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Tapir Talo Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Tadik Talar permanent resident of Tado Gitu Village Po and PS Tato Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia, Sr. Adv, Idak Bam,Bomchi Taipodia,Ligam Nochi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Binter Picha,Tao Tarin,1 P Tsering,Tabung Nonang,Signal Yirang,A Perme,Krishna Dubey,Lissing Perme BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 10.09.2026 Heard Shri I. Bam, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Pangu, learned State Counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2, Shri B. Picha, learned Counsel for respondent no. 3 and Shri L. Perme, learned counsel for the private respondents. The cause of action for approaching this Court was non receipt of compensation of acquisition of land of the petitioner. It is contended that the private respondents who are the neighbours of the petitioner had received such compensation and the petitioner was left out. Shri Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner has however submitted on instructions that in the meantime the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the private respondents and therefore, he would not like press this writ petition. Page No.# 3/3 In view of the above aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is closed JUDGE Comparing Assistant