APHC010957212017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI //k. ’Qs: >o o w oy^ MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.1288 of 2017 Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 22/09/2017 in OS.No.15 of 2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District. Between; 1. Lekkala Mohan Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy, Aged about 66 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village, Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2. Smt. Lekkala Lalitha, W/o. Mohan Reddy, Aged about 64 years, Occ; Business, R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village, Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...Appellants/Defendants AND 1. Ganta Jogi Reddy, S/o. Peddi Reddy, Aged about 54 years, Occ; Business, R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village, Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2. Smt Ganta Chandrakala, W/o. Ganta Jogi Reddy, Aged about 47 years, Occ; Business, R/o. Pedda Amberpet Village, Hayath Nagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District. ...Respondents/Plaintiffs £ Counsel for the Petitioners ; SRI M V SURESH Counsel for Respondent No.1: SRI K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for Respondent No.2: SRI A SANJEEVA REDDY The Court made the following Judgment: APHC010957212017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 1288 OF 2017 Between: 1.LEKKALA MOHAN REDDY, S/0. RARNI REDDY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT 2.SMT. LEKKALA LALITHA,, W/0. MOHAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC: B'USINESS RIO. PEDDA ARNBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT ...APPELLANT{S) AND 1.GANTA JOGI REDDY, S/0. PEDDI REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAYATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT 2.SMT GANTA CHANDRAKALA, W/0. GANTA JOGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO. PEDDA AMBERPET VILLAGE HAVATH NAGAR MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): allow by setting aside the judgment and decree dt. 22/09/2017 in OS.no. 15 of 2013 passed by the PrI. Dist. Judge, Ongole lA NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP 3235 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the 2 petition, the High Court may be pleased to 'suspend the operation of the judgment and decree, dated 22-09-2017 in O.S. No. 15 of 2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Ongole, pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of justice and fair play, and be pleased to pass such further orderlS, as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. lANO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the 1st petitioner herein to represent on behalf of the 5th respondent by virtue of General Power of Attorney given by the 5th petitioner in favour of the 1 st petitioner and to pass. praying that in the lA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit the petitioners 3 to 5 herein to come on record as appellants 3 to 5 in A.s. No. 1288/2017 being the Legal Representatives of the deceased 2nd petitioner/2nd appellant in A.s. N0.1288/2017. praying that in the lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY of all further proceedings in EP.No. 235/2018 in OS.No. 15/2013 on the file of the court of I Additional District Judge, Ongole, and to pass lANO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay order dated.15.03.2023 in IA.No.1 of 2020 in AS.No.1288 of 2017 and pass Counsel for the Appellant{S): 1.M VSURESH Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.ASANJEEVA REDDY 2.KB RAMANNA DORA 3 The Court made the following Judgment: Sri M.V.Suresh, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the appellants are not interested to prosecute this Appeal any further and hence, a Letter dated 24.06.2025 was addressed to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission to withdraw the present Appeal. 2. Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. In that view of the matter, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. / Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTfON OFFICER To 1. The District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District.(with records) 2. One CC to Sri M V Suresh, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri A Sanjeeva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri K B Ramanna Dora, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 6. Two CD Copies TK vna HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 JUDGMENT A.S.No.1288 of 2017 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN