RAJINDER KAUR & ANOTHER v. GURINDER SINGH SODHI (DPPI-SE)
COCP/365/2026 · 2026-04-22
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3962 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3962 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-365
IN THE HI
101
Rajinder Kau
Mr. Gurinde
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
violation of Court in CW of Punjab an
2.
respondent 11.09.2025 passed by th nothing surv 365-2026
-1-
E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H
COCP Date o
er Kaur and another
Versus
urinder Singh Sodhi
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG,
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present contempt petitio on of order dated 11.09.2025 (Annex CWP-27403-2025, titled as ‘Rajind and others’ whereby it has been di
“xxx
xxx
6. At this stage, respondent legal notice dated 21.05.2025 the petitioner, within a period o receipt of certified copy of this and well reasoned order. In c entitled to the relief claimed in shall be released to them alon interest forthwith.”
At the very outset, it is subm dent-State that in compliance of t 2025 (Annexure P-1) Speaking Orde by the Director School Education (S survives in the present petition.
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-365-2026 Date of Decision: 22.04.2026
.… Petitioners
.... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ate for the petitioners. AAG, Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Rajinder Kaur and another vs. State een directed as follows:-
xxx dent No.2 is directed to decide the 025 (Annexure P-8) submitted by iod of four months from the date of this order, by passing a speaking In case, the petitioners are found d in the instant petition, the same along with a reasonable rate of submitted by learned counsel for of the Writ Court order dated
Order dated 20.04.2026 has been tion (Secondary), Punjab. As such,
ging Writ tate he by of ng nd me of for ated een uch, RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.23 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
COCP-365
3.
Court by lea thereof, has
4.
5.
required to b of, according
6.
Speaking O
7.
8.
22.04.2026 rishu
365-2026
-2-
Copy of Speaking Order dated by learned counsel for the responden f, has also been handed over to learned
Heard.
In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly.
The petitioners would be at libe
Order dated 20.04.2026, in accorda
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
r dated 20.04.2026 handed over in ondent is taken on record. A copy
learned counsel for the petitioners. above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid ccordance with law, if so advised. any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No
Yes/No r in opy are sed said RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.23 12:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.