Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39618 (AP)

S.Dharma Teja v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/45908/2018 · 2025-07-29

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010949972018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45908/2018 Between: 1. S.DHARMA TEJA, S/O VENGAIAH, AGED 23 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O SANTHINAGARAM, ALLAGADDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MALKAPURAM POLICE STATION, MALKAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 5. RAVI GOWRINATH, S/O AND AGED NOT KNOWN, INCS, NAVAL BASE, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein in respect of complaint filed by the 5th respondent dt.28.11.2018 with regard to interfering with the civil dispute between the writ petitioner and 5th respondent as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article-14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the writ petitioner and 5th respondent or not to take any coercive steps against the writ petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 herein not to harass and not to interfere with the civil dispute between the writ petitioner and 5th respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45908 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Sri K.Shankar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 30.07.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45908 of 2018 Date: 30.07.2025 PSA