Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39613 (KAR)

SRI B K LOKESH v. SRI T PRAKASH

COMAP/74/2024 · 2025-10-23

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2024 BETWEEN SRI B. K. LOKESH, S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED 45 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S HARSHITHA ENTERPRISES, NO. 16, OPP. CHANDANA LAYOUT, SREEGANDAKAVALU, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, SUNKADAKATTE, BENGALURU – 560 091. ...PETITIONER/S (By Sri./Smt : S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, DR. PRAJWAL K. ARADHYA, LOKESH RAO B. S., RAJESH V. LADDA, OORVI UMESH, ADVOCATES) AND SRI T. PRAKASH, S/O THIMMAIAH A., …2 COMAP NO.74/2024 2 AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO. 47, NEAR SOLLAPURADAMMA TEMPLE, VISWANEEDAM POST, SUNKADAKATTE, BENGALURU – 560 091. …RESPONDENT/S The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP / Commercial Appeal Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, praying that this Honble Court be pleased to: 1. Call for the records in Com.O.S. No. 303/2023 LXXXII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Court at Bengaluru. 2. To set aside the Judgment dated 15.12.2023 and decree passed by LXXXII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Court at Bengaluru in Com.O.S. 303/2023 and 3. Pass any other order or orders as this Honble Court deems fit to pass in the facts and circumstance of the case including the costs of the appeal, to meet the ends of justice. This Commercial Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following order. …3 COMAP NO.74/2024 3 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Finally, time is granted upto 07.11.2025 to comply with the office objections. If the office objections are not complied, the appeal shall stand rejected without further orders from the Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 23.10.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby rejected. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS Ty dt : 22.11.2025 C.dt : 24.11.2025