APHC010965402018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 47332/2018 Between: 1. J. SUVARNA RAJU, S/O. DAVEDU, AGED 61 YEARS. OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O.H.NO.2-2-1109, PLOT NO.EWS/61, BHATUKAMMA KUNTA, SHIVAM ROAD, HYDERABAD - 500 044. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WOMAN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. A P WOMENS COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION, UNDAVALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring, the proceedings No.WDC 51- 11046/1/2018-Establishment, dt.29-10-2018 issued by the 2nd respondent thereby terminating the petitioners services as standing counsel for the 2nd respondent corporation, as illegal, irregular, irrational and without any authority of law and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue his services as standing counsel for the 2nd respondent for prosecuting and defending its cases before this Hon’ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PARTY IN PERSON Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner/Party-in-person seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring, the proceedings No.WDC 51- 11046/1/2018-Establishment, dt.29-10-2018 issued by the 2nd respondent thereby terminating the petitioners services as standing counsel for the 2nd respondent corporation, as illegal, irregular, irrational and without any authority of law and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue his services as standing counsel for the 2nd respondent for prosecuting and defending its cases before this Hon’ble Court.....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner/party-in-person and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner/party-in-person today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 47332 of 2018 01.07.2025 Mjl /*