1 2025:CGHC:31815 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2874 of 2024 1 - Manoharlal Dodani S/o Late Chelaram Chopda, Aged About 69 Years, At Karsan Heritage Mowa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) (Appellant ) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Erine Fiber Factory at Shop No.3, Ground Floor, Karsan Chambers, Mandi Road, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Other Address - Make In India Chowk, Opposite Telibandha Police Station, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Sahejdeep Singh Chaddha S/o Shri Gurmeet Singh, Aged About 31 Years, At- House No. 47, Kalpataru Amlidih Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate : SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY DN: cn=SHYNA AJAY, o=PERSONAL, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 9.7.2025 1. Heard. 2. This Petition under Section 419(4) of the BNSS, 2023 has been preferred against the judgment of acquittal dated 6.8.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur (CG) in Criminal Complaint Case No.52/2023, whereby, the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that recently in the judgment dated 08.04.2025 rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025 INSC 804, right to file appeal under proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. was discussed and it was held that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused and such appeal shall lie to the Court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction of such Court. He submits that the Petition may be disposed of reserving liberty so as to avail the said remedy. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission and considering the law declared in the matter of Celestium Financial (supra), this 3 Petition stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file an appeal within a period of 45 days from this order before the appropriate Court, in accordance with law. It is further made clear that if such an appeal is filed before the concerned Court within the time given by this Court, it would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the same in accordance with law. 5. Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned judgment and relevant documents to counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. 6. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of. 7. Consequently, all the pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Shyna/Priyanka