APHC010968232018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46811/2018 Between: 1. THATIPARTHI JOHN PRAKASH, S/O. PRAKASHAM, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. SOCIAL ACTIVIST, R/O. MAMIDIPALEM, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 5. THE S H O CUM CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUQ P.S., PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 6. THE TAHASILDAR, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 7. GANGA VENKATESHWARULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE TALUQ P.S., PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 8. JILAKARA PUNNAIAH, S/O. SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. NIL, R/O. PULIVENKATA REDDY COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT 9. BATHULA MARIYAMMA, W/O. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC. NILL, R/O. 2ND LANE, INDRAMMA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 2 10. CHITTI CHAKRAVARTHI, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. NILL, R/O. 2ND LANE, INDRAMMA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 11. SHAIK MOHAMMED BHUJJI, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. NILL, R/O. 2ND LANE, INDRAMMA COLONY, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 5 and 7 in encouraging respondents 8 to 10 to encroach plot Nos. 108 to 111 and 164, 166 to 168 which were allotted to some beneficiaries mentioned in writ affidavit and also the action of respondents 5 and 7 in encouraging the respondents 8 to 10 in lodging false cases against the petitioner and also the action of 6th respondent in not taking any action in restoring the plots back to the beneficiaries, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry against respondent No. 7 for misusing his official position as Circle Inspector and also direct 3rd respondent to take action to get the plots restore to the allottees and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 3rd respondent to take action to get the plots restore to the allottees, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46811 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Sri B.Surya Chandra, learned counsel representing Sri N.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, by stating that the cause in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 46811 of 2018 Date: 13.08.2025 PSA