Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39608 (AP)

N.Thirupalu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/46065/2018 · 2025-06-30

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010942152018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 46065/2018 Between: 1. N.THIRUPALU, S/O. NARASIMHAM, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. RETD. PRINCIPAL, SRI SARVODAYA COLLEGE, NELLORE,R/O 3-4-493/3, FLAT NO.301, MAAGAYATHRI PLAZA, BARKATHPURA, HYDERABAD - 500 027 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, O/O. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, 1ST FLOOR, ANR TOWERS, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521 108. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGIATE CAMPUS, GUNTUR 522 001 4. THE CORRESPONDENT, SRI SARVODAYA COLLEGE, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH-524 003 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents sanctioning provisional pension after nearly two years after retirement and delaying the payment of full pension and retiral benefits of petitioner for four years without any charge sheet or justifiable reason, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/-towards mental agony and financial hardship suffered by petitioner, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. PARTY IN PERSON Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner/Party-in-person seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents sanctioning provisional pension after nearly two years after retirement and delaying the payment of full pension and retiral benefits of petitioner for four years without any charge sheet or justifiable reason as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- towards mental agony and financial hardship suffered by petitioner and to pass .....” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner/Part-in-person and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner/Party-in-person today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Higher Education is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 46065 of 2018 01.07.2025 Mjl /*