APHC010946532018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 45744/2018 Between: 1. CHAGANTI KANTHAMMA, S/O SAMBI REDDY, R/O D.NO.12- 455/2/1, NEAR AVAVINDA SCHOOL, N.H-5, TADEPALLI, TADEPALLY MUNICIPAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. V NARAYANA KARIVEPAKU BUJJI, S/O NOT KNOWN, OCC. BUSINESS. R/O KUNCHANAPALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No. 3 for interfering in the Civil dispute and compelling me to come for Private Settlement, is bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary and violation of principle of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere into civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SAI MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No. 3 for interfering in the Civil dispute and compelling me to come for Private Settlement, is bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary and violation of principle of natural justice and to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri K.Sai Mohan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil dispute. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.07.2025 MH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 174 WRIT PETITION NO: 45744/2018 Dt.25.07.2025 MH