SMT. SAPNA WIFE OF SHRI BHAGWAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15955/2025 · 2025-11-20
Sanjeet Purohit
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39601 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39601 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46873] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15955/2025 Smt. Sapna Wife Of Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village Dhaurmui, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, Ra- jasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Energy, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (Jvvnl), Through Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. Superintending Engineer (Commercial), Jvvnl, Jaipur.
4. Executive Engineer ( O And M), Jvvnl, Bharatpur.
5. Assistant Engineer (A-Iii/ O And M), Jvvnl, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order 20/11/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner runs a EV charging station at the outlet of petrol pump and having a load of 60 KW.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioner had applied the electricity connection in LT category however, the respondent Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited vide its order dated 23.09.2024 has granted the electricity connection in HT category.
3. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon Rajasthan Electricity Vehicle Policy, 2022 and submits that in view of Clause 7.2.2 of the said policy, HT category connection so granted to the petitioner is not justified.
[2025:RJ-JP:46873] (2 of 2) [CW-15955/2025]
4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that various representation have been made by the petitioner but the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed by the respondent authority. Thus, the petitioner seeks limited indulgence for directing the respondent authorities to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law more specifically in view of the provision of Rajasthan Electric Vehicle Policy, 2022.
5. Limited prayer so made by the petitioner deserves accep- tance.
6. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is dis- posed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the respondent authorities within a period of 15 days from to- day, raising all grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
7. The respondents are directed to consider and decide the said representation strictly in accordance with law, while granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to pass a reasoned or- der within a period of two months after receipt of such representa- tion.
8. Stay petition and all pending application(s) if any, also stand
disposed of.
9. It is made clear that directions in this order shall not be construed to decide the petitioner’s representation in a particular way and the action is required to be taken in strictly accordance with law.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J PAYAL DHAWAN /16