Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39601 (MAD)

S.I.SAYED SHANAWAS v. THE THASILDHAR

WP/11149/2025 · 2025-04-03

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Writ Petition No.11149 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.11149 of 2025 S.I.Sayed Shanawas S/o. Sayed Ismail, Eakara Sha Taikal, Near Kodikalnagar, Manjakuzhi Village, Buvanagiri Taluk, B Mutlur Post, Cuddalore 608 501. Petitioner Vs The Thasildhar Taluk Office, Buanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District 608 601. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2025 by directing the respondent to pass orders on the enquiry conducted on 30.08.2024 in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Mohammed Abbas For Respondent : Mr.M.R.Gokulkrishnan Additional Government Pleader ***** O R D E R 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.11149 of 2025 This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 01.02.2025 wherein the petitioner has sought for issuance of patta in his name. 2. Heard Mr.E.Mohammed Abbas, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr.M.R.Gokulkrishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondent. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that orders have been passed by the respondent through proceedings dated 28.03.2025. On going through the order, it is seen that the petitioner's representation was rejected and a copy of the order has also been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In the light of the above development, no further orders can be passed in this writ petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent, it is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.11149 of 2025 This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. 03.04.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm To The Thasildhar Taluk Office, Buanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District 608 601. N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.11149 of 2025 Writ Petition No.11149 of 2025 03.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis