- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46032 CRP No. 171 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 171 OF 2022 BETWEEN: AFZAL PASHA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O CHOTE SAB NO.30, 2ND CROSS, 3RD MAIN, ASHWATHNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 094. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHAHIDA KHANAM J, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 052 REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. MADEENA MASJID ASHWATHNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 094 REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR. 3. SRI. ALLAH BAKASH RETIRED WAQF OFFICER AND ENROLMENT OFFICER, MADEENA MASJID, ASHWATHNAGAR, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46032 CRP No. 171 of 2022 BANGALORE - 560 094. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.S. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MOHAMMED OWAIS SULTAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3; VIDE ORDER DATED 24.06.2022, NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) *** THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 83(9) OF WAQF ACT 1995 AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED ON I.A.No.1 IN APPLICATION No.15/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU DIVISION, BENGALURU DISMISSING THE I.A.No.1 UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS CRP, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 has filed a memo on 11.11.2025. Memo reads as under. "The petitioner has filed the above Civil Revision Petition challenging the order on I.A.No.1 dt.1-4-2022, rejecting I.A.No.1 filed for application for stay. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46032 CRP No. 171 of 2022 During the pendency of the above C.R.P., the Hon'ble Waqf Tribunal, Bengaluru Division, at Bengaluru has disposed of the main Application by order dt.3-9-2022. Hence, the above C.R.P. does not survive for consideration. Hence, the above C.R.P. may kindly be disposed of accordingly, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accepting the memo, revision petition stands disposed of. However, the contents of the memo, if found incorrect, counsel for the petitioner is at liberty to revive the revision petition. Pending I.A.No.1/2022 is consigned to record. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7