Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 396 (MAN)

Thokchom Ingoba Singh v. State Of Manipur Represented By The Chief Secretary And 3 Ors

WP(C)/18/2024 · 2025-05-27

A Guneshwar Sharma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No. 47-48 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 18 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 10 of 2024 Thokchom Ingoba Singh …..Petitioner/s - Versus – State of Manipur represented by the Chief Secretary & 3 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 28.05.2025 [1] Present Ms. Malemleima, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M. Rarry, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. M. Nikita, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. M. Rendy, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. [2] By the present petition, the petitioner challenged the appointment of respondent No. 4 on in-charge basis. [3] Mr. M. Rarry, learned senior counsel, produces a copy of the order dated 27.01.2025 issued by the Deputy Secretary (RD & PR),Government of Manipur stating that the petitioner retired from service on 28.02.2025 on attaining the age of superannuation and hence, the cause of the writ petition does not survive and may be closed. [4] Ms. Malemleima, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that question of law may be kept open. [5] Recording the submissions made at the bar, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. Misc. application is also closed. [6] Question of law is kept open to be adjudicated in appropriate proceeding. JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring KH. JOSHUA MARING Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA MARING Date: 2025.06.02 11:25:23 +05'30'