APHC010942902018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 45570/2018 Between: 1. NANDIKOLLA GANESH, S/O CHINNA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O D.NO.14-2-08, BOLLAVARI STREET, MANDAPETA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE DIRECTOR PERSONNEL, RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER HR RECRUITMENT, RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER HR RECRUITMENT, RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondents No. 2 and 3 in not giving appointment letter in favour of the petitioner for the post of MT (Technical) pursuant to the recruitment advertisement No.02/2017 is highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner to the post of MT (Technical) pursuant to the written test and interview conducted on 29.10.2017 and 25.12.2017 respectively and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondents No. 2 and 3 in not giving appointment letter in favour of the petitioner for the post of MT (Technical) pursuant to the recruitment advertisement No.02/2017 is highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner to the post of MT (Technical) pursuant to the written test and interview conducted on 29.10.2017 and 25.12.2017 respectively and pass ....” 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 45570 of 2018 09.07.2025 Mjl /*