Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39591 (RAJ)

MAMTA VERMA W/O SHRI RAVINDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19296/2025 · 2025-12-10

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50160] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19296/2025 Mamta Verma W/o Shri Ravindra Kumar, Aged About 46 Years, R/o B-6/365, Chitrakoot Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner Rajasthan. 3. The Principal, Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School, Pragpura Block Paota District Kotputli Behror. 4. Smt. Sharmila, Principal, Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School, Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School, Pragpura Block Paota District Kotputli Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain for Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Sharma, AAAG and Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: I) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the Impugned Order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 23.9.2025 passed by the respondents & Impugned order Dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur in Appeal NO. 4681/2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal at Govt. Girls [2025:RJ-JP:50160] (2 of 2) [CW-19296/2025] Sr. Secondary School, Pragpura District Kotputli Behror. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Learned counsel for respondent(s) submits that the petitioner has joined on new post. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /301