Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39586 (KAR)

SMT VANI SHTHYAN v. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK

WP/27673/2023 · 2025-10-08

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39611 WP No. 27673 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.27673 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VANI SHTHYAN W/O SATHYAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.28 DADDY'S SOUTH BOURGH KAMMASANDRA MAIN ROAD HEBBAGODI NEAR ROYAL PUBLIC SCHOOL ELECTRONIC CITY BENGALURU - 560 0100. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. FELIX, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. JAGADISH J.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK HASSAN BRANCH NO.1874, CITY POINT B N ROAD HASSAN - 573 201 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39611 WP No. 27673 of 2023 RESPONDENT TO SEPARATE THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF THEY GOING FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AS PER PAPER PUBLICATION PUBLISHED IN KANNADA PRABHA AND INDIA EXPRESS NEWS PAPERS ON 08.11.2023 PRODUCED AS ANNX-A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for writ of mandamus against the respondent-Bank, seeking direction to separate the petition schedule property in the event of public auction as notified at Annexure-A and B to the writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Taking into consideration the publication at Annexure-A and B, which is of the year 2022 and the said publication has been made as per the provisions under Rule 25 and 28 of Schedule II of Income Tax - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39611 WP No. 27673 of 2023 Act 1961, I am of the opinion that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22