Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3958 (AP)

Vanamu Suryavathi v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1266/2019 · 2025-07-15

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010025372019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1266/2019 Between: 1. V SURYAVATHI, E.G.DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, E.G.DIST. 2. R, R 3. R, R 4. R, R 5. R, R ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents is illegal where the respondents 2 to 4 herein failed to initiate necessary action for conducting enquire about laying of roads in Ayavatam Village where the 5th respondent withdrawn the entire estimatioin amount without complying render conditions is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of tender and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 herein to conduct enquire about the laying roads in Aryavatam village of Kajuluru Mandal as per the representations of the petitioners dated 26.07.2017 and 22.10.2018 and 25.10.2018 dated and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B S S PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1266/2019 This Court made the following ORDER: Sri B.S.S. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 16.07.2025 Krk HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 57 WRIT PETITION No.1266 of 2019 16th July, 2025 krk