NARENDRA ALIAS NAND KISHORE TIWARI v. RAMGOPAL TIWARI
WP227/666/2022 · 2025-03-06
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39573 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39573 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:11106
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(227) No. 666 of 2022 • Narendra Alias Nand Kishore Tiwari S/o Late Khedu Prasad Tiwari Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya District Kabirdham --------- Defendant No. 1
... Petitioner Versus
1. Ramgopal Tiwari S/o Late Khedu Prasad Tiwari Aged About 57 Years R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh At Present R/o Jai Hind Chowk, Kapa Lodhipara Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh----------- Plaintiff No. 1
2. Mahendra Tiwari S/o Late Khedu Prasad Tiwari Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---------- Plaintiff No. 2
3. Rekha Tiwari W/o Late Deepak Tiwari Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ----------- Defendant No. 2
4. Balkrishna S/o Late Deepak Tiwari Aged About 12 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Rekha Tiwari, R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---------- Defendant No. 3
5. Kumari Isha D/o Late Deepak Tiwari Aged About 10 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Rekha Tiwari, R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ----------- Defendant No. 4
6. Kumari Devika D/o Late Deepak Tiwari Aged About 8 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Rekha Tiwari, R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya ------------- Defendant No. 5
7. Kumari Laxmi D/o Late Deepak Tiwari Aged About 6 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Rekha Tiwari, R/o Ward No. 6 Bazarpara Chowk Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ----------- Defendant No. 6
8. Savitri S/o Lakhan Lal Pandey Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Pathakpara Mungeli, Tehsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh --------------Defendant No. 7
9. Annapurna W/o Umesh Tiwari Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Pathakpara Mungeli Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh --------------Defendant No. 8
10. Homesh Kumar Chandravanshi S/o Kamta Chandravanshi Aged About 32 Years R/o Village And Post Ruse P.S. Pandatarai, Tahsil Pandariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ------- Defendant No. 9 Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2 11.State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh------------- Defendant No. 10
... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Neelu Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For Respondents No. 1, 2, 8 & 9 For Respondent No. 11/State : : Mr. Atul Kesharwani, Advocate Mr.
Pramod Ramteke, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/03/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the impugned order dated 06.10.2022 Annexure P/1 and be pleased to reject the application for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC filed by the plaintiffs/respondent No. 1 & 2. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner’s matter. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. At the very outset, Ms. Neelu Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Ms. Neelu Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti