HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28269 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 24, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chhaya Gupta, Sujeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I.(2012/3658), Aditya Pandey, Devendra Kumar, J.N.Maurya, M.C. Chaturvedi, M.C.Tripathi, R.K. Singh, Suresh Singh (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Darshan Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru Secy. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad