Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39513 WP No. 27028 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.27028 OF 2023 (GM-ST/RN) BETWEEN:
1.
A GOPAL S/O LATE ANNAYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
2.
SRI SHANKAR R.
S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
3.
ANANDA R.
S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
4.
SRI. N. VENKATESH S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT MARKET ROAD, NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE, KADUGUDI, BENGALURU -560067. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NARASIMHAIAH K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE SUB REGISTRAR HOSAKOTE KAMMAVASI PETE
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39513 WP No. 27028 of 2023
ALAPANA HALLI-562129.
2.
THE DEPUTY THASILDAR BANGALORE EAST TAULK BENGALURU - 560067.
3.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH & EAST KANDAYA BHAVAN K.G. ROAD BENGALURU - 560001.
4. MUNISWAMAPPA S/O LATE BACHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT KADUGUDI, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK - 560067.
5.
R RAMAIAH S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS RESIDING AT KADUGUDI, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560067.
6. MUNINARAYANA S/O LATE MUNIRAJA @ GULLA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT DEVASANDRA K.R. PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU - 560037.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39513 WP No. 27028 of 2023
7.
SMT JAYAMMA W/O LATE MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT KADUGUDI, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-A SALE DEED NO.5232/1972-73, DATED 26.03.1973, EXTENT 0-9 1/2 GUNTAS, HOSAKOTE AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Sale Deeds produced at
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39513 WP No. 27028 of 2023
Annexures-A, A1 and A2, and such other revenue proceedings.
4. Taking into consideration the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of UP and Another vs. Uttar Pradesh Rajya Khanji Vikar Nigam Sangharsh Samiti and Others reported in (2008) 12 SCC 675, the disputed question of title cannot be considered by this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India and therefore, the writ petition does not survive for
consideration and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21