M. Mohan Reddy v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APS RTC)
WP/45377/2018 · 2025-06-30
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39562 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39562 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010937662018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 45377/2018 Between:
1. M. MOHAN REDDY, S/O. M. MEERA REDDY, AGED 56 YEARS, RETD RTC DRIVER R/O. 8-17A, NEAR CHECK-POST PENUMUR VILLAGE AND POST AND MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION APS RTC, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN RTC HOUSE, 1ST FLOOR.
NTR ADMINISTRATION BLOCK, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA-520013, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APS RTC CHITTOOR -2 DEPOT CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in paying salary to the petitioner till date of his retirement and retirement benefits including pension as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct respondents to pay the salary till the date retirement on medical invalidation and retirement benefits including pension along with interest @ 24 percent p.a on the delayed payments of salary and retirements benefits including pension and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in paying salary to the petitioner till date of his retirement and retirement benefits including pension as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct respondents to pay the salary till the date retirement on medical invalidation and retirement benefits including pension along with interest @ 24 percent p.a on the delayed payments of salary and retirements benefits including pension and to pass....”
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 45377 of 2018
01.07.2025
Mjl /*