[2025:JHHC:33323] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9942 of 2025 ------ Roshan Kumar Chaturvedy @ Sonu @ Roshan Kumar @ Roshan Chaturvedy, aged about 32 years, S/o Ram Kumar Chaturvedy, R/o- Qtr. No. 688, Street 13, Sector 9B, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. + P.S. Harla, District Bokaro (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lal Chandrahas Nath, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III Mr. P.C. Sinha, AC to GA III ------ Order No.02 Dated-07-11-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with CID P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(5), 338, 336(3), 340(1), 340(2), 61(2), 111(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail. Earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 09.07.2025 passed in B.A. No.5589 of 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only fresh ground is that some of the co-accused persons have been admitted to regular bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and submits that the allegations against the co-accused persons, who have been admitted on regular bail stand on different footings as that of the petitioner and in the absence of any fresh ground, the petitioner ought not to be admitted to bail. It is next submitted that there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not to be released on bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner of embellishing the Government money to the tune of Rs.9,00,00,000/- and keeping in view the criminal antecedent of the petitioner that he is also involved in another case of similar nature regarding fraudulent withdrawal of Rs.10,40,47,946/- as also the fact that prosecution evidence is yet to begin and only charge sheet has been submitted as well as chance of his absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the above named petitioner to bail at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the above named petitioner is rejected at this stage. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.11.2025 Saroj/