Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39540 (BOM)

PRAKASH VITTHAL KADAM v. VASANT VITTHAL KADAM AND ORS

IA/10324/2024 · 2025-02-12

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

55-IA-10324-2024.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10324 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 5049 OF 2022 Prakash Vitthal Kadam … Applicant/Appellant Vs. Vasant Vitthal Kadam and Others … Respondents Mr. Kishor Ajetrao for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. A. M. Kulkarni a/w. Mr. Shailesh Chavan and Mr. Hrishikesh Avhad for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 6. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 12th FEBRUARY 2025 ORDER : 1. This application is for restoration of the second appeal with a prayer for condonation of delay and to recall the conditional order granting time to remove office objections. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that inadvertently the objections were not removed within time. He submits that all the objections would be removed within four weeks from today. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, delay is condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) and (c) 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.02.14 08:27:22 +0200 55-IA-10324-2024.docx subject to the learned Advocate for the appellant removing all office objections within four weeks from today. 4. It is clarified that if objections are not removed this application will stand dismissed without further reference to court. 5. If objections are removed, office is directed to register the second appeal and list it High on Board under the caption for “Fresh Admission”. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2