APHC010927122018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 44794 Between: Kallem Bikshapathi and Others State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SUBBA RAO POSANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GHANTA SRIDHAR 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 44794 OF 2018 Kallem Bikshapathi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): SUBBA RAO POSANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): GHANTA SRIDHAR GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 44794 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not initiating action on the illegal erection of the new telecommunication infrastructure ground base tower/ equipments being carried on by the 3rd respondent on the land bearing Block No.35, Sy.No. 816/C1, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District, without obtaining the final approval and without following the guidelines specified in G.O.Ms.No.146, dated 19.06.2015 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take action against the illegal erection of the above tower and pass such other orders....” 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 would submit that there is no proposal to erect Cell Tower in the premises covered in this Writ Petition. 3. Recording the submissions made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.04.2025 KK