Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39532 (BOM)

BHAGWAN GANAPATI GADGIL v. VIKRAM BALKRISHNA KULKARNI

CAS/1230/2018 · 2025-01-10

Gauri Godse

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

22.534.18 sa.docx Iresh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 534 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1230 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 534 OF 2018 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2020 Bhagwan Ganapati Gadgil and ors .....Appellants Vs. Vikram Balkrishna Kulkarni and ors .....Respondents Mr. Ajay Raje Nimbalkar i/b Mr. S. S. Patwardhan Advocate for the Appellant in SA 1534/2018 and 174/2020 Mr. Sagar Pandit Gadgil (POA of the appellant) Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar for the respondents CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 10th JANUARY 2025 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the appellants has tendered the affidavit of the appellants alongwith copy of the settlement agreement between the parties. 1/2 IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2025.01.14 11:20:08 +0530 22.534.18 sa.docx 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to take on record the affidavit of the appellants and the settlement terms recorded in the agreement. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute that in view of the amicable settlement between the parties, nothing would survive in the second appeal. 3. Hence, copy of the agreement alongwith affidavit is taken on record. 4. In view of the aforesaid, learned advocate for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw both the appeals. 5. Leave granted. The second appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. 6. In view of disposal of the second appeals, all pending applications are disposed of as infructuous. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2