APHC010934062017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 43101/2017 Between: Pusuluri Rambabu, and Others The Commissioner and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 43101/2017 Pusuluri Rambabu, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Commissioner and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): M CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) [3460] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 43101/2017 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not registering the plots allotted to them by excluding the Ac 2.32 ½ Cents land in Survey No.84 of Skahamuru Village surrendered by the father of the 1st and 2nd petitioners which is the subject matter of OS.No.219 of 2016 as illegal arbitrary and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to register the plots allotted to them in pursuance of the land surrendered by the petitioners in Skahamuru Village, Thulluru Mandal in Land Pooling Scheme for construction of Andhra Pradesh State Capital..” The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent authorities are likely to be allotted plots shortly. In that view, no orders are required to be passed at this stage. However, the counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to res-judicata the issue in the event if the respondent authorities are not allotted the plots to the petitioners. 02. Recording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date:03.04.2025 KKV 12 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO:43101 OF 2017 03.04.2025 KKV NYAPATHY VIJAY,J