Kanneboina Adilakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/40225/2017 · 2025-08-11
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39527 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39527 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010931902017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 40225/2017 Between:
1. KANNEBOINA ADILAKSHMI, W/O VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER, SHOP NO.0803031, SRI TRIPURA SUNDARI DWAKRA PODUPU SANGAM, NADIGADDA VILLAGE, TRIPURANTAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES (CS-I) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
3. THE TAHSILDAR, TRIPURANTAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the Notification bearing Rc.No. 1099/2017 dt. 20-10- 2017 inviting application for filling up the Fair Price Shop Dealership of Shop No. 0803031, Nadigadda village, Tripurantakam Mandal, Prakasam District,
2
contrary to the directions issued by this Hontle Court in W.P.No. 59 of 2015 and batch dt. 4-9-2015 and without following the Rule of Reservation indicated in G.O.Ms.No. 4 dt. 19-2-2011, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondents to continue the petitioner as Fair Price Shop Dealer of Shop No.0803031 and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 49903 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned Notification bearing Rc.No. 1099/2017 dt. 20-10-2017 issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 28.11.2017 made in WP No. 40225/2017 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following:
3
ORDER: Mr.
Venkata Reddy Chittem, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 12.08.2025 LSP
4
118
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 40225/2017
12.08.2025 LSP