sAPHC010932682018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45054/2018 Between: 1. SUNKARI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE SANYASI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.7-38, OPP. MAIN GATE OF KORUKONDA SAINIK SCHOOL, KORUKONDA VILLAGE, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. SUNKARI ACHIYAMMA, W/O LATE PAKIR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.7-37, OPP. MAIN GATE OF KORUKONDA SAINIK SCHOOL, KORUKONDA VILLAGE, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM RURAL POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. SIRUPURAPU SATYAM, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KORUKONDA VILLAGE, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2 5. KAMIREDDY MAHESH, S/O RAMU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KORUKONDA VILLAGE, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in registering the FIR basing on the report dt.13-10-2018 of the petitioners and not taking any action against the respondents 4 and 5 as illegal, arbitrary, against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register the FIR basing on the report of the petitioners dt.13-10- 2018 filed before the 3rd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register the FIR basing on the report of the petitioners dt.13-10-2018, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45054 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 12.08.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that on receipt of petitioners’ complaint dated 13.10.2018, the police conducted preliminary enquiry which revealed that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is of civil in nature and therefore, the police will not interfere in such civil disputes. 3. Recording the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission itself. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach proper forum, for necessary relief. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 19.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 45054 of 2018 Date: 19.08.2025 PSA