APHC010925002018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAP^ WRIT PETITION NO: 45142 OF 2018 Between: 1. C.Vikas, S/o. Narasimhulu, Age 27 years, unemployed R/o.D.No.959, Balaji Nagar, TIRUMALA, Chittoor Dist. 2. C.Narasimhulu, S/o. C.V. Subbaih Private Business, R/o. D.No. 959, Balaji Nagar, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. ...Petitioners AND 1. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Rep. by its Executive Officer Tirupati Chittoor Dist. 2. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Endowments) Department Secretariat, Amaravathi Guntur Dist., A.P. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order, direction or Writ more suitably WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the 1®* respondent in appointing the 1®‘ petitioner who is legal heir of the 2"^ petitioner a recognised a displaced person as per ROC.No.P01/508/AEO(P)/TML/95, dt. 05-01-2011,on par with other 86 legal heirs who are appointed as per the 1®‘ respondent Board resolution No. 35 dated 27-04-2009 is illegal arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of the doctrine of LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION and also violates Art. 14 and Art. Revenue 21 of the constitution and consequently direct the 1®* respondent to appoint 1 petitioner a legal heir of the 2'^'' petitioner who is a displaced person as per the .Resoiution No. 35 dt. 27-04-2009 of the 1®* respondent Board. St I ti { lA^O: Af2018 ' A Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1®* respondent examine and take necessary action directed by the 2 as nd respondent vide Memo No.REVOI- TTDOTTDE(APPT)/1/2018 Endlll-REV, dated 30-10-2018 and also petitioners representations 18.1.2018 with in a time period as fixed by this Honourable Court. Counsel for the Petitioners; SRI P. V. VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI A. PRABHAKAR SARMA, SC FOR TTD Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following order: APHC010925002018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 45142/2018 Between: 1.C.VIKAS, S/0. NARASIMHULU AGE 27 YRS., UNEMPLOYED R/0.D.N0.959, BALAJI NAGAR, TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DIST. 2.C.NARASIMHULU, S/0. C.V.SUBBAIH PRIVATE BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO. 959, BALAJI NAGAR, TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DIST. ...PETITIONER{S) AND 1.TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. 2.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DIST., A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order, direction or Writ more suitably WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in appointing the petitioner who is legal heir of the 2nd petitioner a recognised a displaced dt.05.01.2011,on par with other 86 legal heirs who are appointed as per the 1st respondent Board resolution No. 35 dated 27-04-2009 is illegal arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of the doctrine of LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION and also violates Art. 14 and Art. 21 of the Constitution and consequently direct the 1®* respondent to appoint 1®‘ petitioner a legal heir of the 2"^ petitioner who is a displaced person as per the Resolution No.35 dt.27-04-2009 of the 1®' respondent Board and pass ROC.No.P01/508/AEO(P)/TML/95, person as per Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P V VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.A PRABHAKAR SARMA SC FOR TTD 2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue order, direction or Writ more suitably WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent in appointing the petitioner who is legal heir of the 2nd petitioner a recognised a displaced person as per ROC.No.P01/508/AEO(P)/TML/95, dt.05.01.2011,on par with other 86 legal heirs who are appointed as per the 1st respondent Board resolution No. 35 dated 27-04-2009 is illegal arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of the doctrine of LEGHTMATE EXPECTATION and also violates Art. 14 and Art. 21 of the Constitution and consequently direct the respondent to appoint 1^ petitioner a legal heir of the 2"*^ petitioner who is a displaced person as per the Resolution No.35 dt.27-04-2009 of the 1®^ respondent Board and pass...." 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption "For dismissal represented for the Petitioners today. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. , none Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIKMOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to Sri P. V. Venkateswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri A. Prabhakar Sarma, SC for TTD [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 45142 OF 2018 C^“3SEP2D»^ ^V/» 35S ★ Pi DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS