Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39517 (CHH)

SMT. MAHESHWARI YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9416/2025 · 2025-09-09

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:46120 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9416 of 2025 1 - Smt. Maheshwari Yadav W/o Shri Chintamani Yadav Aged About 44 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt- Primary School, Bargari Nayapara, Block Charama, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of School Education Ministry Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Kanker District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Kanker District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Kanker, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Charama Block Charama, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Alok Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, J. Order on Board 10-09-2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the Transfer Policy, a Committee has been constituted to consider the grievances of the Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.12 12:09:45 +0530 2 employees, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to take recourse to law available to the petitioner. He would also submit that petitioner has already moved representation(s) before the Committee for redressal of her grievances. 2. Learned State counsel not opposed the above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of above, present petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy available to her before the Committee, constituted under the Transfer Policy. 4. Accordingly, present petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Aadil