y APHC010923582017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3019 OF 2017 Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C, being aggrieved by the order dated 26.07.2017 in CrI.M.P No. 1580 of 2016 in C.C No. 261 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class/Ill Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati. Between: 1. B. Anjaneyulu, S/o. B. Radhakrishnaiah Chetty, R/o. D.No. 19-586/1, Masonical Grounds, Mittoor, Chittoor District. 2. B. Subbaraja Chetty, S/o. Venkatachalamaiah, R/o. D.No. 22-232/1, Kattamanchi, Chittoor District. ...Petitioners/Accused AND 1. Y Neelakantaiah, S/o. Late Ramaiah, Mango Merchant, Settygunta Village & Post, Railway Koduru Mandal, Kadapa District. 2. The State of A P, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Hyderabad. at ...Respondent/Respondent y lA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 4909 OF 2017) / Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 26.07.2017 in CrI.M.P No. 1580 of 2016 in CC No. 261 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class/Ill Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Prithvi Sreeramaneni Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri Balaji Medamalli Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order: L APHC010923582017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3019/2017 Between: I.B. ANJANEYULU, S/0. B. RADHAKRISHNAIAH CHETTY, R/0. D.NO. 19-586/1, MASONICAL GROUNDS, MITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, i 2.B. SUBBARAJA CHETTY, S/0. VENKATACHALAMAIAH, R/0. D.NO. 224232/1, KATTAMANCHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.Y NEELAKANTAIAH, S/0. LATE RAMAIAH, MANGO MERCHANT, SETTYGUNTA VILLAGE & POST, RAILWAY KODURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2.THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. I I ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to I lA NO: i OF 2017(CRLRCMP 4908 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 18 days in representing the above Criminal Revision Case. lA NO: 2 OF 2017rCRLRCMP 4909 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 26.07.2017 in CrI.M.P Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.PRITHVI SREERAMANENI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.BALAJI MEDAMALLI The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the parties have settled the matter out of the Court. 2. In that view of the matter, the Criminal infructuous. respondent No. 1/complainant submits that the Revision Case is dismissed as As^ sequel, Miscellaneous petitions if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, T The III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class/Ill ■ (With Records) i. Advocate [OPUC] Balaji Medamalli, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Additional Junior Civil Judge. Tirupati, Chittoor District 2. One CC to Sri. Prithvi Sreeramanen 3. OneCCto Sri. Pradesh at Amaravathi [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal 6. Two CD Copies Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Stu sree \ \ HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 3019 OF 2017 O 2?SFf2l)25 ™ X- iS> CaA . Current section . DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS