Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39504 (AP)

SRIRAMENI RAJU PUTTUR CHITTOOR v. VASAVI KANYAKA PARAMESWARI SANGAM &3 ORS

SA/228/2002 · 2025-01-31

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010928602002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 228/2002 Between: Srirameni Raju Puttur Chittoor ...APPELLANT AND Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Sangam 3 Ors ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. BHASKAR GORLA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K S GOPALA KRISHNAN The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 04.12.2001 passed in A.S.No.34 of 2000 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Puttur, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 31.07.2000 passed in O.S.No.199 of 1996 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Puttur. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:31.01.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.228 OF 2002 Date:31.01.2025 MS