Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:68460 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9214 of 2024 Applicant :- Tarun Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brajesh Kumar Solanki,Samrat Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Harish Chandra Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Brijesh Kumar Solanki, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Harish Chandra, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Ms. Harshita Rani, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed to quash the proceedings of Case No. 132218 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 279 of 2022 (State vs. Tarun Sharma & others), under Sections- 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Section- 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District-Ghaziabad, pending in the court of Civil Judge, Junior Division / Judicial Magistrate / F.T.C., Court No. 1, Ghaziabad as well as cognizance order dated 28.07.2023.
3. From perusal of the records, it appears that this case was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. As per mediation centre report dated 02.03.2025, the parties had appeared before the mediation centre on different dates but mediation has failed, therefore, the Court has proceeded to hear this case on merit
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the basis of vague allegations, the applicant along with his family has been falsely implicated. Therefore, the impugned proceedings deserves to be quashed.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that perusal of the F.I.R. as well as statement of opposite party no. 2, prima facie, cognizance is made out on the basis of materials available on record.
6. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of record, it appears that the opposite party no. 2 in
her statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. made specific allegation against the applicant. This court does not find any illegality in the impugned proceedings.
7. Accordingly, the present application is rejected. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Manoj Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad