Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39484 (RAJ)

PINTU S/O RAMKESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13095/2025 · 2025-10-13

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41522] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13095/2025 Pintu S/o Ramkesh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Peepalda, Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/10/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 in respect of FIR No.595/2024 registered at Police Station Lalsot District Dausa for the offences punishable under Section 125(a), 281 & 106(1) of BNS. 2. It has been contended by the petitioner in the petition that the allegation for driving the vehicle in question is on unknown person and not upon the petitioner. It has further been contended that co-accused Rmalakhan S/o Sitarma has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.06.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.7693/2025 and similarly one another co-accused [2025:RJ-JP:41522] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13095/2025] namely; Mahendra Meena S/o Ramkesh Meena has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.02.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1386/2025 and even the juvenile involved in the case has also been enlarged on bail passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.612/2025. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application. 4. Considered the contentions made in the petitioner and submissions made at Bar by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. In view of the above, where the persons, who are similarly situated, have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court and the allegation for driving the vehicle in question is not upon the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Pintu S/o Ramkesh shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 595/2024 registered at Police Station Lalsot District Dausa on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. [2025:RJ-JP:41522] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13095/2025] (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /133