Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010912192018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 44074/2018 Between: Kancherla Punnaiah ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“... to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not allowing the petitioner to attend to his duties during the subsistence of Agreement of Contract without issuing any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under the Statute and in contravention of the terms Agreement of Contract Service as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and to grant such other........”
2. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the relief sought for in this Writ Petition has become Infructuous and that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
3.Learned Government Pleader for Education is in attendance.
4. In that view, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
2
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 44074 of 2018
24.06.2025
Mjl /*