APHC010893882018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 43277/2018 Between: 1. POLIMETLA SANTHA RAO, S/O LATE YESUBHAKLU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 2-95, JOGADIGUDEM, KAMAVARAPUKOTA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, NEAR GOVT. ARTS COLLEGE, E.G.DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION A P, GUNTUR. 4. BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SYED APPALA SWAMY JUNIOR COLLEGE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT VIJAYAWADA-520 009, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent No. 5 herein in conducting the interviews on 9-11-2018 without any intimation to the petitioner and without declaring the results of the interview held on 6-8-2018 pursuant to the notification dt. 24-5-2018 as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and consequently direct the 5th respondent to assigning the reasons for conducting the interviews on 9-11- 2018 pursuant to the application dt.19-11-2018 and to cancel the interviews if any held on 9-11-2018 and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SEETA RAMAIAH TENNETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent No. 5 herein in conducting the interviews on 9-11- 2018 without any intimation to the petitioner and without declaring the results of the interview held on 6-8-2018 pursuant to the notification dt.24-5-2018 as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and consequently direct the 5th respondent to assigning the reasons for conducting the interviews on 9-11-2018 pursuant to the application dt.19.11.2018 and to cancel the interviews if any held on 9-11-2018 and to pass ...” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Education appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 43277 of 2018 04.07.2025 Mjl /*