Juvvadi Narasimha Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/43683/2018 · 2025-07-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39476 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39476 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010903232018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 43683/2018 Between:
1. JUVVADI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. JUVVADI VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 63 YEARS
EX. SECRETARY OF PACS, ATREYAPURAM R/O. ATREYAPURAM, AMALAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE REGIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. THE PRESIDENT, ATREYAPURAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCITY ATREYAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not implementing the directions of the 2nd respondent vide Letter no.420/2017-B dt.27.02.2017 directing the 3rd respondent to release the gratuity and leave encashment and other benefits as per Service Regulations of employees of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., in favour of the petitioner basing on the representation of the petitioner dated 23.2.2017 is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also against the Service Regulations of employees of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., and consequently direct the respondents to release the gratuity and leave encashment and other benefits as per Service Regulations of employees of Primary Agricultural
2
Cooperative Society Ltd., in favour of the petitioner immediately in the interest of justice and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KONDAPARTHI SRINIVASA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not implementing the directions of the 2nd respondent vide Letter no.420/2017-B dt.27.02.2017 directing the 3rd respondent to release the gratuity and leave encashment and other benefits as per Service Regulations of employees of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., in favour of the petitioner basing on the representation of the petitioner dated 23.2.2017 is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also against the Service Regulations of employees of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., and consequently direct the respondents to release the gratuity and leave encashment and other benefits as per Service Regulations of employees of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., in favour of the petitioner immediately in the interest of justice and to pass ...”
2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 43683 of 2018
04.07.2025
Mjl /*