1 APHC010909852018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 44002/2018 Between: 1. VEGESANA ANANDA GAJAPATHI RAJU,, S/O. V. KRISHNAM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. SRI SANTHI SRI SADAN, BEHIND HAMSA MEDA, SUBBA RAOPETA, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAM, LABBIPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the letter Dt. 26.09.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and capricious and to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the letter Dt. 26.09.2018 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to regularise/permanent of service of 30 years of the writ petitioner, and to pass such other order or orders. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to take immediate action in respect of considering the letter Dt. 26.09.2018, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring on record the petitioners 2 to 4 as the legal representative of the 1st petitioner viz. V.Ananda Gajapathi Raju in the above writ petition No.44002 of 2018 as petitioners 2 to 4 and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K KRISHNA MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V,R.N PRASHANTH SC FOR TTD The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that despite submitting a letter dated 26.09.2018 to the respondents, they have not considered the said letter and not passed any orders. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the respondents to consider the letter of the deceased 1st petitioner dated 26.09.2018 and take appropriate decision over the issue. 2. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that they have no objection for giving such direction to the respondents for passing appropriate orders on the 3 letter submitted by the deceased 1st petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders without touching the merits of the case. 3. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the letter dated 26.09.2018 which has been submitted by the deceased 1st petitioner and take appropriate decision over the matter according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.06.2025 ARR 4 271 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 44002/2018 Dt.27.06.2025 ARR