Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39473 (AP)

C R K S RAO, E.GODAVARI DIST v. C V SUDHARANI, W.GODAVARI DIST

CRP/3931/2016 · 2025-07-22

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010902422016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3931/2016 Between: 1. C R K S RAO, E.GODAVARI DIST, S/O. VEERAJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC; BUSINESS, R/O. RATNAM ENTERPRISES, SIRI LODGE, OPP; RAILWAY STATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. C V SUDHARANI W GODAVARI DIST, W/o. Srinivas, aged about 34 years, R/o. 3-3-2, Kovil Street, Narasapur, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the dismissal orders passed by District Judge, Rajahmundry in ATA.NO. 12 of 2015, dated. 02.02.2016 confirmed by the Special Officer cum Principal Junior Civil Judge, Amalapuram E.Godavari District in ATC.No. 13/2007, dated 30.04.2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 5070 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including execution of the orders of the Special Officer cum Principal Junior Civil Judge, Amalapuram in ATC NO. 13/2007, dated. 30.04.2015 during the pendency of the above revision petition and may pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SUBRAHMANYAM KURELLA 2. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU 3 The Court made the following Order: Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 23.07.2025 BMS