JALANDAR ALIAS ABHISHEK AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/7246/2025 · 2025-04-15
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar J Criminal, Vivek Kumar Birla
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55555-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7246 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jalandar Alias Abhishek And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ritesh Rai,Vinod Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
1. Heard Sri Vinod Shankar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rahul Asthana, learned A.G.A. for State- respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 26.11.2024, registered as Case Crime No. 0276 of 2024, under Sections 152(2), 352, 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023, Police Station Sri Rampur, District Deoria. Further prayer has been made to make an inquiry against the respondent nos.3 and 4.
3. Although the prayer for quashing of FIR has been made, but without insisting on the same, only submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment upto seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 B.N.S.S. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017 Writ Petition (Criminal) No.
156 of 2017 and in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCC 51 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147.
4. We have gone through the impugned first information report and without interfering in the same, we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of the judgements as noted above. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Radhika Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad