Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39469 (AP)

PASUPULATI MOHANA RAJA v. BOYINA NAGARAJU AND 2 ORS

SA/401/2002 · 2025-07-20

V Srinivas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010905622002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL NO: 401/2002 Between: 1. PASUPULATI MOHANA RAJA, - ...APPELLANT AND 1. BOYINA NAGARAJU AND 2 ORS, - ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section ___________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2002(CMP 10190 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C C S SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. M V S SURESH KUMAR 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL No.401 of 2002 JUDGMENT: On 21.01.2025, 27.06.2025 and 14.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 22.07.2025 JLV 3 163 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL No.401 of 2002 Date: 21.07.2025 JLV